Back to the birds

 

 

Sometime in 2014 I was putting together the story of how wildfowl at rattlechain had first been identified to have been exposed/poisoned by the white phosphorus in the lake. Unfortunately whilst Rhodia claimed to be addressing the issue that they had long delayed and denied, so it began to unravel that Sandwell council had murdered 220 Canada geese in two of its parks.

The council were well aware of the rattlechain issue and did absolutely nothing about it. Yet somehow in their bizarre twisted little minds, the geese posed a “health risk” to members of the public and were exterminated- they have still to produce any credible evidence to prove this.

On the other hand our long battle that they undermined with this single action, was proven by the testing of twelve birds consisting of five different species- all exposed to a poisonous substance, proving that their Oldbury business chums had poisoned the birds.

So picking up the threads of where I had left of, I have now started to put together these important pages to stand as a testament to the unfortunate creatures and hopefully give them and the many others that were never retrieved or those  which had shown white phosphorus poisoning symptoms but were never tested some justice.

Part of this is showing up the human incompetence, from a regulatory point of view to how the birds were treated by the then VLA staff, and the poor standard of investigation which transpired.

It is perhaps timely to do this when in the week I saw a dead coot being eaten by a buzzard at the side of the newly profiled North embankment. Who knows what caused its death, it had gone the next day without trace, but it was noted like the many that had gone before.

 

S4190003

 

Let us hope that as more digging has mysteriously appeared on this embankment, that the phos has not awakened, or a portal to attempt to disperse its breakdown products opened.

S4240002

S4240003

More bank cover up

So as we take a closer look at Rhodia’s dirty dozen, let’s first look at the incompetence which led to “phosphorus” being tested for in a dead swan and mallard instead of white phosphorus. One would think that scientists would know the difference, but it appears sadly not in this “error of communication”. As ever with all concerning the story of rattlechain lagoon, we only learned of this through persistence and the Freedom of Information Act.

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Back to the birds

The cruel poisoners

One of the most infamous cases involving the use of phosphorus based rat poison involved Louisa Merrifield. She was the care worker from hell, who ingratiated her way into the affections of an elderly 79 year old cantankerous spinster named Sarah Ricketts and through greed poisoned her to obtain her house. She had managed to change the will of the old woman from Blackpool in her favour just two weeks after moving into the property with her husband Alfred.

Alfred was in fact her third husband and there has to be suspicion that Merrifield had already bumped off the other two elderly husbands whose deaths could not be proved for their money.

A previously convicted fraudster, Merrifield boasted of her good fortune at coming into money and told two people that she had already received a windfall from an old woman who had died- this before her plan had been even commenced. Her husbands name also appeared on the will, and this led to him also being accused of murder.

Merrifield first attempted to get a doctor to affirm that Mrs Ricketts was of sound mind when signing her changed will, which did not work and then began a process of trying to convince others that her employer was seriously ill. One wonders today if she had what is known as having “Munchausen’s syndrome by proxy”, but this psycho babble undermines the intent on which people like Merrifield had.

The dose of phosphorus was delivered in the form of Rodine rat poison , disguised in rum. Alfred had bought a tin from Manchester before Mrs Ricketts death. This was another black mark against him as a potential co-murderer.

The presence of rum disguised the taste of phosphorus. Had she already used the method on her two dead husbands to perfect the technique? Unfortunately for Merrifield her knowledge of phosphorus poisoning was not that good however as she made the mistake of administering more than one cocktail of the substance. In between doses she called a doctor in an attempt to try to prove that the old woman was becoming deathly ill, but as phosphorus poisoning initially gives the impression that someone is recovering, she administered another dose which would be her undoing. For this reason, traces of the second dose would be found.

The doctor refused to sign Mrs Ricketts death certificate, and soon a trail leading to the Merrifield’s and their motive led to their arrests and trial.

The 1953 trial was most interesting in its examination of forensic evidence , particularly in “proving” that phosphorus had caused the death of Mrs Ricketts. We have of course had the same nonsense originally from Rhodia in attempting to “prove” that deaths of wild birds were being caused by the same chemical, and where “small amounts” that could not be found in larger amounts due to the nature of the evanescence of the element , would not be enough to cause death.

An original cutting of the case is shown below, and it is quite amazing that the prosecution witness Dr George Manning took it upon himself to concoct a potion of rum and rat poison and actually put it in his mouth without swallowing it.

Unfortunately no phosphorus traces were found on a spoon found in Merrifield’s bag, and the defence witness, Professor J.M Webster whom amongst other titles was Professor of Forensic medicine and toxicology at the University of Birmingham- (Albright and Wilson “friends”), attempted the ludicrous claim that she had died of natural causes and liver necrosis. It would be interesting to know what method was used in determining the amount “found” in Mrs Ricketts’s system, which of course would not be the amount she actually swallowed.

Scan_20151121 (3)

In an eleven day trial at Manchester Assizes, Louisa Merrifield was found guilty of murder yet her husband was acquitted due to lack of evidence. Bizarrely he was even allowed to inherit half a share of Mrs Rickett’s bungalow from the murder.

An appeal was rejected, and on 18th September 1953, Louisa Merrifield was hanged by Albert Pierrepoint at Strangeways prison.

“You have been convicted on plain evidence of as wicked and cruel a murder as I have ever heard tell of” Mr Justice Glyn -Jones told Merrifield as he had sent her down.

It is with some irony that just ten years later, new legislation would be passed using this exact same word “cruel” to describe the effect of white phosphorus on animals.

Merrifield was of course a very foolish woman, yet with expertise in analytical chemistry, it would be quite possible to poison someone with such a chemical even today, whereby those carrying out such a post mortem would probably have no experience of ever coming across a person whom had ingested white phosphorus without their knowledge.

Perhaps it should not just have been Louisa Merrifield on the scaffold that day but the directors of Albright and Wilson, whose company had manufactured this “cruel poison” which killed Mrs Ricketts. Their poisoning of wildfowl would take  many more years to deduce, with their cocktail containing “toothpaste” instead of rum to disguise the taste.

 

 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on The cruel poisoners

A bum note from the French horn

A while back we reported on Solvay’s big band practice.  A recent press report appears to confirm that The Langley Band have now completed a move into the former police station fronting Trinity Street and are renting a room from the chemicalsters. Yes that’s about the size of the story, with a cake and self promotion chucked in. How many groups/clubs/societies change venue for one reason or another every day of the week? Jeez.

As for the bum note, this is provided by Solvay site director (they used to be called works managers who lied about chemicals coming out of the factory).

Jean-Francois Berthiaume is quoted “Solvay is proud of its historical links with the community.”

Well that’s really interesting that because they were so enamoured with their “historic links” at  Rattlechain that the Belgians chose not to rebrand their logo onto the gates down John’s Lane. THEY REMAIN UNDER THE TARNISHED RHODIA MONIKER.

S1980001

And lest we forget the immoral conscience of Albright and Wilson the company where so readily its tentacle web of external links polluted minds as well as the environment.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on A bum note from the French horn

“Shocking History”- THE PHOS AWAKENS

 “White phosphorus has three unusual properties: it glows in the dark, it bursts into flames when exposed to air, and it is a deadly poison. Little wonder that it aroused the interest of the early chemists and has left in its wake a trail of minor tragedies and major catastrophes.”

Scan_20151019

In another post concerning phosphorus, this New Scientist article from June 1977 outlines the story of the discovery of the elemental form by Hennig Brandt and quite a bit more history that has transpired since that fateful first illumination. John Emsley would later write “The shocking history of phosphorus”, alternatively known as “The thirteenth element-A biography of The Devil’s element” for the American market.    This appears to be an early  precis version of this book, but gives compact detail about how white phosphorus has been used both foolishly and with malice.

“Phosphorus firebombs were the most immoral use to which the element has ever been put. These devices played a minor but terrible part in the frenzied urban holocausts inflicted on European and Japanese cities in the latter half of the Second World War. The burns produced by droplets of blazing phosphorus were notorious for their deep penetration, intense pain, and slowness in healing. Deployment of these weapons led to the same feeling of outrage that a later generation expressed about napalm.”

From quack doctors and match making madness to murder and war, Emsley covers it all in this article, with pointers to some environmental incidents as well. Albright and Wilson are of course mentioned, though at this point in history their company was going down the swanny in its own steam. We do learn from the piece that in 1977, production of p4 was at over 2 million tonnes, this just 14 years after the chemical had been banned in Britain for rodenticide use being a “cruel poison” .

Emsley offers a frank account of the chemical which probably did little favour for its manufacturers corporate attempts to paint their industries social responsibility agenda. In 1977 this was important and the spotlight was very much on legal reform of the waste industry in Britain. One can imagine the top brass at Albright and Wilson feeling a little uneasy under the collar when reading such a piece and candid appraisal of their element’s use, deliberately omitted in their company history “100 years of phosphorus making” published 26 years previously.  Unfortunately however appearing in such a title as The New Scientist and before the advent of the internet age the information would not be read at large by the public- the ones that needed to know what that chemical factory down the road in Oldbury and others like them were actually doing with such a chemical on their doorstep.

It would have been good if the West Midlands County Council and in particular the fool of a county waste disposal officer when passing the site licence in December of that year had actually read such an article, and furthermore taken on some of the facts on board.

“There appear to be no environmental implications in the continued use of the site.” was what Ken Harvey decreed , and how wrong he was- totally in every respect.

The final paragraph is perhaps the most telling in relation to Rattlechain and Rhodia/Solvay’s burial of the chemical under water. The bird deaths at the site over the years just open up a can of worms that continue the “shocking history” of the chemical and also the shocking way that those in charge of such sites  appear more in awe of it to be able to stop its wrath.

“Elemental phosphorus played an important part in the development of chemistry since it was a useful starting material for hundreds of new compounds, but to allow it to escape from the laboratory and into the world at large was an act of folly. Today it is safely tamed and back in its cage; but when that cage is a rail tanker holding molten phosphorus (which is how it is transported in the United States for example), one wonders how long it will be before it strikes again.”

Scan_20151019 (2)

 

Scan_20151019 (3)

 

 

Scan_20151019 (4)

 

Scan_20151019 (5)

S1980001

For how long will Rhodia Limited be able to contain their beast?

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on “Shocking History”- THE PHOS AWAKENS

Chasewater revisited

 

S3590001

Back in July, I blogged about an unreported pollution issue at one of the regions main areas of water, which attracts a large number of wildfowl. Swans at Chasewater Country Park have over a number of years suffered lead poisoning, with several birds at the start of the year found either dead or ill.

I also looked at one particular former waste disposal licence granted to Walsall council during their period of control at the site where they were allowed to dump their parks and recreation waste. This was just one of several licences in the vicinity of this site, and there is far more industrial history associated with the area than just this, which I never intended to go into in that blog post. It is just one idea that was previously not chronicled by anyone else, and just as valid a source of the lead as any other, and certainly the one being offered by the local council.

I also mentioned the manner in which  Staffordshire County Council had misled the public about a “boating lake ” which they and others had previously called “the duck pond”. They stated originally that it would be refilled , but it never was. This is important because when the wildfowl were on this lake and not the main contaminated one, the link of poisoning was broken. It was therefore in some respects from someone who cares about these birds, more desirable to have them reside on “the duck pond”. In the past a pair actually bred on the island, which is practically impossible on the main lake due to fluctuating waterlevels and no suitable habitat.

Following this I asked a freedom of information request to this council asking for clarification about this issue. This was dealt with in the previous blog post, but I asked for an internal review because the original response was basically a press release and not a freedom of information response to the questions I had asked.

I challenged them on a number of points.

“The response that I received was a potted history from the council’s point of view, but contained no hard information to corroborate any of it. I therefore request the communications with Natural England concerning this pool as stated- letters, emails etc
in my request, and not a summary PR spin job.
You also failed to answer my question concerning recorded information as to what level within your council this decision was taken to drain and not refill the pond. Ranger, cabinet member- who?
It is noted that for several months your council misled people with notices that the pool was going to be refilled, and that since the lake was drained several swans have died from lead poisoning on this lake, whereas they were not when occupying “the duck pond”-
which was called this on one of the noticeboards at Chasewater country park until for some reason it was recently removed after this request had been made. I have pictures.

 

The council did come back with more information than it had provided previously, and this in part is what I am now reporting in this post. This appears to be a series of emails internally within the council, concerning my request and also information that I had requested originally. Let’s deal with this one first-

“—–Original Message—–
From: Glaisher, Ali (Place)
Sent: 21 July 2015 14:57
To: Wykes, Ian (Place); Sharman, Matthew (D,L&T); Archer, Steven (Place); Holford, Steve (Place); Saberton, Dan (Place)
Cc: Allen, Gemma (D,L&T)
Subject: RE: Internal review of Freedom of Information request – Correspondence with Natural England regards Chasewater duck pond GA2542

Ian

It was not a duck pond but a boating lake.  We need to remember that.

Correspondence attached

Lead poisoning would not be an issue if people stopped feeding swans and geese where we know there is an issue due to the old firing range and have a notice asking them not to.  The notice could be made more prominent.”

I am afraid this shows the total lack of understanding of the ecologist at this council, Ali Glashier about the whole issue.

  • THEY CALL IT THE “DUCK POND” IN THEIR OWN RESPONSES IN THE EMAILS!!
  • LEAD POISONING WILL STILL BE AN ISSUE FOR AS LONG AS THE BLOODY LEAD IS IN THERE!
  • THEY DO NOT HAVE ANY PROOF THAT THE OLD FIRING RANGE IS TO BLAME FOR THE SOURCE, AS WAS DISCUSSED IN THE PREVIOUS BLOG POST.
  • THE FACT THAT THEY APPEAR TO CONCENTRATE ON FEEDING APPEARS TO BE A SEPERATE ISSUE ALTOGETHER (THEIR PET HATE), TO THE FACT THAT BIRDS WOULD STILL UPEND FOR FOOD IN SHALLOW SEDIMENTS AND INGEST THE MATERIAL.

The actual correspondence with Natural England appear to take place between Dan Saberton ecologist at Chasewater and Jacylyn Lake “lead advisor Staffordshire land management team.”    . NOTE IT IS REFERED TO HERE AS “CHASEWATER DUCK POND” BY BOTH!

From: Saberton, Dan (Place) [mailto:[email address]]
Sent: 06 October 2014 12:09
To: Lake, Jaclyn
Subject: Chasewater Duck Pond

 

Hi Jaclyn,

Hope you’re ok?  Hope my answerphone message wasn’t too garbled!

Just to keep you up to date with the duck pond, we’ve emptied it and disposed of the water.   We’ve had a contractor repair the valve this last week and we are now considering re-filling it.   We’re still not sure if we are going to re-fill it as if we have to empty it the same way the cost would be prohibitive.

Did you manage to get any figures for nutrient levels that we would be able to discharge?  I appreciate that it probably isn’t as simple as we’re imagining!

Noreen has suggested we get together to discuss options for the pond, would you be happy to come along?  If so would you like to suggest availability ?

Many thanks

Dan”

AT THIS POINT IT APPEARS THAT THE COUNCIL WERE DUBIOUS ABOUT REFILLING THE POND AND WERE PROBABLY LOOKING FOR AN EXCUSE NOT TO- HENCE “NUTRIENT LEVELS”.

A reply was received below.

From: Lake, Jaclyn [mailto:[email address]]
Sent: 08 October 2014 11:12
To: Saberton, Dan (Place)
Subject: RE: Chasewater Duck Pond

 

Hi Dan – sorry for the delay in getting back to you

I have chased Ruth for some guidance on the acceptable level. What do other councils with duck ponds do?  I will try and find out. 

Is there really no way that some of the water could be drained into the nearest sewer?  At a really low rate over a long period?   

Can you give me a bit of time to ask around to see what other people have done – this must not be a unique problem!

Thinking about it, could the pond not be turned into a wildlife pond?

I need to email you with some guidance about the crassula pond and ditch – would you be able to do some spraying of the ditch this autumn/winter?

Kind regards

 

Jaclyn

It appears at this point that the person at Natural England is a little out of their depth re “duck ponds”!

If that appears bizarre the next reply email from the so called “ecologict” at Chasewater really is off message.

From: Saberton, Dan (Place) [mailto:[email address]]
Sent: 08 October 2014 15:15
To: Lake, Jaclyn
Subject: RE: Chasewater Duck Pond

 

Thanks for this Jaclyn,

We’re trying to think of other ideas for the pond, I’ve even suggested turning it into a skate park or go-kart track!  

I’m sure we can try and spray some crassula in the ditch, it’s a bit weather dependent as I think it needs to be done before we get a frost? If you’ve got some guidance you can send over that would be great.

Many thanks

Dan

HOW IS IT POSSIBLE THAT AN “ECOLOGIST” IS CONSIDERING TURNING A HABITAT AREA FUNCTIONING FOR YEARS BEFORE HE CAME ON THE SCENE AS ANOTHER BLOODY HUMAN SPORTS RELATED PIECE OF CRAP? AT THIS POINT THIS COUNCIL WERE CERTAINLY NOT SHARING THIS VISION WITH THE PUBLIC.  THE NEXT EMAIL FROM SABERTON DATED  26TH JANUARY IS EVEN WORSE..

“From: Saberton, Dan (Place) [mailto:[email address]]
Sent: 26 January 2015 15:02
To: Lake, Jaclyn
Subject: RE: Chasewater Duck Pond

 

Hi Jaclyn,

Thanks for the info about the crassula, I’ll have a look at the options with the Rangers and we’ll see if we can come up with a plan.

On another subject we’ve finally come to a decision about what to do with the concrete duck pond, having looked at all the different options we’ve decided to fill it in with stone and then soil and eventually we hope to use the area for a type of outdoor gym.

We’re currently looking at sources of material for filling it etc but I just wanted to check before anything starts that as long as the valve is secured shut and nothing can get from the pond into the Lake then we don’t need to get any consents from yourselves for the work? 

Hope all that makes sense?

Cheers

Dan

  •  IT SHOULD BE NOTED  THAT THEY WERE STILL NOT TELLING THE PUBLIC THAT THEY WERE NOT GOING TO  REFILL IT.
  • THE OUTCOME THAT I JOKINGLY REFERED TO IN THE PREVIOUS BLOG POST ABOUT TURNING IT INTO “A POOR MAN’S GYM” IS DEPRESSINGLY ACCURATE!

The final email released on the subject is from Natural England to the two ecologists in April, and mentions an event where several people were swimming in the very lake that they appear to suggest certain birds were polluting. One wonders if this new emphasis on attracting sport and money and TV cameras is what is behind all this. I certainly suspect it is the case.

From: Lake, Jaclyn [mailto:[email address]]
Sent: 28 April 2015 17:45
To: Glaisher, Ali (Place)
Cc: Saberton, Dan (Place)
Subject: Chasewater duck pond – clarification

 

Hi Ali and Dan

I am just following up on our conversation last Wednesday after the Ironman meeting.

Despite the problem with the birds, I wasn’t suggesting that SCC refill the pond and reconnect it to Chasewater.  The info we were given at the time by SCC when we advised that it couldn’t be reconnected to Chasewater was that the pond had not been cleaned out for 5-6 years and working with the water analysis we were given, assuming a steady build-up of nutrients over time, we gave SCC the following advice at the time:

The target for the total phosphate in Chasewater is no more that 25ug/l.  With this in mind and the likely accumulation rates of TP in the duck pond water (and not knowing what else if being released into Chasewater) the TP level in the duck pond would always be too high to be able to release it into Chasewater.

The best result though would be that you keep the duck pond somehow (I suggested a wildlife pond or trying to dispose down a sewer slowly but neither of these were viable). Assuming the duck pond is not refilled, I asked our bird people about the long term impacts of the geese moving to Chasewater.  How the geese respond will depend on the attractiveness of Chasewater against the nearby alternatives, and until some monitoring has been done, we won’t know and by that time they could have already done some damage and the population could have increased which would be an even bigger problem.

What I was trying to say on Wed is that SCC need to monitor the numbers of swans and geese that have moved onto Chasewater to see if they start breeding and the impact they may be having on the shoreline.  I have asked our bird specialist to see if he can advise about monitoring in this situation.

Sorry for not being clear last week.

Regards

Jaclyn

Jaclyn Lake

Lead Adviser

Staffordshire Land Management Team

  • So Natural England’s assessment appears based on information supplied by the council rather than its own.
  • The level of 25 micrograms per litre appears to be excessively small. Consider that at Rattlechain the environment agency granted a site licence which appeared to allow several milligrams per litre  to be discharged as phosphate (total phosphorus) directly into the Birmingham canal navigations- THE VERY SAME END FATE FOR THE WATER AT CHASEWATER- WHICH IS AFTER ALL A CANAL FEEDER! SO WHY THE DISPREPANCY? (1 microgram is one thousandth (1×10−3) of a milligram.)
  • During their so called “human health risk assessment” at Rattlechain lagoon, The Health Protection Agency ( now Public Health England) noted a Total phosphorus figure in the Birmingahm Canal of 1330 micrograms per litre. This reading supplied to them by The Environment Agency.
  • THEY NOTED THAT THERE IS NO HEALTH OR ENVIRONMENTAL BASED WATER QUALITY STANDARD FOR TOTAL PHOSPHORUS.
  • THEY FURTHER NOTED THAT THE EU STANDARD FOR THE PROTECTION OF SURFACE WATERS INTENDED FOR THE ABSTRACTION OF DRINKING WATERS WAS 400 MILLIGRAMS PER LITRE.
  • SO BASICALLY PEOPLE ARE NOT DRINKING WATER OUT OF THIS SITE SO HOW AND WHY DO NATURAL ENGLAND COME OUT WITH A FIGURE OF ABOVE 25 MICROGRAMS PER LITRE OF TOTAL PHOSPHORUS BEING TOO HIGH FOR RELEASE? THE TP FIGURE FOUND IN SURFACE WATER AT THE CHASEWATER DUCK POND IS NOT GIVEN IN A LABORATORY TEST REPORT. The report states
  • “Comment The water sample was found to satisfy the requirements of The Bathing Water Regulations 2013 for inland waters. These regulations define standards for the microbiological quality of bathing waters which in this case, is classified as ‘Good’ with respect to the above parameters.”

  • The entire basis for non release of water into the main reservoir is therefore absolutely crazy, and one wonders if this type of diktat is all Government officials have to do with their time one can only favour job losses within cuts to their quangos.
  • Lake’s entire philosophy on the matter appears to be anti wildfowl, which fits perfectly in line with this vile wildlife murdering quangos appeal to Conservative businessmen and backers. Oh who runs SCC?

So on a recent visit to the site, it now appears that the council are going ahead with turning a pool into something else, though they appear to be not too vocal in reporting it judging by the solitary sign advertising the planning application L.15/10

S4050009

So inspecting the council’s website a number of interesting documents fill out a bit more detail.

APPLICATION FORM

The council are applying for permission themselves.

PLANS OF THE SITE

One can see from this schematic diagram the domination that sport appears to play now at this site.

BASIC

LOCATION PLAN

PLAN PROPOSALS

The main detail comes in the SUPPORTING STATEMENT.

“The water was tested and water quality was found to be too poor because of the bird feeding for it to be released into the reservoir. The cost of emptying the pool elsewhere and removing the silt was in the region of £15000. (Please see chemical analysis of water attached)” 

As evidenced above, the water quality standards that this council are producing do not state this whatsoever. THERE ARE NO READNGS FOR TOTAL PHOSPHORUS IN THE REPORTS IN THE APPLICATION. SO WHAT EXACTLY ARE THEY DOING IN PEPETUATING THIS LIE?

The Proposal 
It is proposed to infill the boating lake with 3000 tons of soil from Chasewater Heritage Railway, this would not be construction or excavated waste. The soil has been tested and no contaminants are present. (See attached report). It is proposed that the infilling operation will take about 10 days to complete.  It is intended that these operations will take place on weekdays outside of school holidays to reduce disruption to visitors.  The work is proposed to take place between November 2015 and March 2016. 
Prior to infilling the concrete liner of the pool will be pierced on a 2 metre grid to allow infiltration drainage to occur.  The valve to the Reservoir will be sealed closed meaning there will be no direct link to the Reservoir.  
Once infilled, it is proposed to grass and landscape the site in accordance with the proposals set out in the attached landscaping scheme.   
The possibility of installing an exercise trail or other facilities such as mini-golf on the grassed area are being investigated but will be dependent on whether sufficient funding can be secured. These types of proposal are in line with the Development Plan proposals for the site.”

NO ATTATCHED SOIL SAMPLE ANALYSIS IS PROVIDED IN THE MATERIAL, SO ONE WONDERS WHO CARRIED THIS OUT, AND WHY THEY ARE INTEDNING TO USE THIS MATERIAL- IS IT CONTAMINTED, BUT REMOVING IT “OFF SITE” WOULD BE TOO EXPENSIVE FOR THIS “POOR” COUNCIL? IS GETTING RID OF THIS “CONTAMINATED” SOIL BY THE BACK DOOR  WHAT IS BEHIND THIS COUNCIL’S DESIRE TO FILL IN A POOL?

Another outline history of Staffordshire’s involvement with this site is detailed, yet they appear to try to distance themselves from admonishing Lichfield district council, who for years had quite happily allowed water to flow into the main lake, and with what problems did it ever cause?

S3590006

Water flowed from the duck pond into the main lake

 

S3590010

The water way

S3590012

Water flowed out into the main lake

 

Following some reorganisation  to the layout of the south shore by Lichfield District Council a few years ago, members of the public have been feeding the wildfowl both on and by the boating lake, encouraging them to settle on it.  As a result, the boating lake has become known locally as the “duck pond.” 

There are claims about water quality, yet the supporting scientific evidence does not show what they are claiming to be the case, and it is not clear from these two results what they are actually trying to prove. There is no result for total phosphorus even provided. When the Natural England officer as seen earlier doesn’t appear to have a bloody clue, one wonders why this council are so keen to argue on a point concerning total phosphorus. On a lake the size of Chasewater this amount of discharge would be absolutely negligible, as would the amount of total phosphorus produced by any birds. (Conservationists appear to have a great obsession for phosphorus in duck shit, yet human shit and elemental phosphorus as demonstrated at rattlechain appears to go completely over their self important bigoted tiny minds.)

 

See Ali Glashier’s ecological statement

“It is not predicted that there will be adverse impacts on the Chasewater and Southern Staffordshire Coalfield Heaths SSSI due to the proposed works.” 

Except that birds will continue to be lead poisoned, but this appears unimportant because of the bloody SSSI status.

S3590004

S3590005

excluded and relegated for human expansion

NEEDLESS TO SAY I WILL BE FORMALLY OBJECTING TO THIS PROPOSAL IF ONLY TO RAISE AWARENESS OF THE ISSUE, AND BE A THORN IN THE SIDE OF AN AUTHORITY WHICH MISLEADS PEOPLE AND CARES MORE ABOUT ITS OWN “STATUS” THAN ANY OF THE WILDLIFE WITHIN IT. LICHFIELD CARED, STAFFORDSHIRE DON’T. I COULD NOT GIVE TWO FUCKS ABOUT THE SSSI STATUS OR NAZI ENGLAND’S WAR ON WILD ANIMALS AND BIRDS THROUGH ITS DOGMATIC HOLIER THAN THOU CULT OF CONSERVATIONISM. I CARE ABOUT THE SWANS AND OTHER BIRDS AT THIS SITE AND BEYOND AND WILL ALWAYS DO SO.

And if that’s considered shouting then good, because this blog will always tell things unreported rather than covering them up and saying nothing.

“Staffordshire County Council

A Connected Staffordshire where everyone can prosper and be healthy and happy.”

*except wildfowl.

S3590002

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Chasewater revisited

Radio links Rattlechain

A big thank you to Nyrees and all the gang at Dark City Radio for allowing me the chance to waffle on about Geese, phosphorus and Rattlechain.

It’s difficult to get all the story into a few minutes, especially when going live, but I hope it was done some justice.

The show has now been archived and can be downloaded in case you missed it HERE.

Some links about themes raised

SAVE OUR SANDWELL CANADA GEESE WEBSITE.

LINK TO PETITION TO STOP SANDWELL COUNCIL KILLING BIRDS AND USE NON-LETHAL METHODS OF MANAGEMENT.

WHITE PHOSPHORUS.

AMOUNTS OF WHITE PHOSPHORUS CONTAMINATED MATERIAL DUMPED IN RATTLECHAIN UNDER LICENCE – OFFICIAL ENVIRONMENT AGENCY FIGURES.

scan0015

Will we ever get to the bottom of it?

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Radio links Rattlechain

Live on Dark City Radio

Just a quick plug that I will be on the permaculture show with Nyrees this Friday from 9.00pm on Dark City Radio. It’s an internet radio show so you will need to get on the website to listen in. The show has quite a wide range of themes around permaculture and environmental issues that affect us all. Hope to be talking about geese, phosphorus, and of course Rattlechain Lagoon…..

S3740006

The Good…..

 

scan0001

The Bad…..

And the ugly...

And The Ugly…….

DARK CITY RADIO.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Live on Dark City Radio

Underground overground Womble in Oldb’ry

A former resident of Wimbledon has fallen on hard times. As a forerunner to David Cameron’s “big society” a London womble has been relocated to Sandwell for housing. Unfortunately what he was promised by the local authority traffickers did not appear to be quite what he expected. This is his story……

S3600010

A furry outcast refugee,

 Got off the train at Oldbury.

H2350004

Lost, confused  he needed aid

a home, some food- a job that paid.

 

As if by magic a fella appeared

His accent was a little weird.

“Hello ah kid, u want a place?”

said the rotund chubby face

 

“This is a great place to stay

you want a job, it will pay?”

 

The job flyer add was very clear  

“Litter champion wanted here”

 

Oh yes sir thank you very much

I have experience in such.”

 

“Well this is where you as to crash

in return for pickin up trash.”

S3870001

 

A dotted map guided our champ

to where he was to work and camp.

 

The womble pondered on his way

of the street where he was to stay.

 

“Nelson”- a name of mystery

An admiral or African history?

S3600001

Turning the corner he dropped the map

On seeing the giant load of crap

 

H1370021

 

 

 

 

S3600002

 What a shocker for our guy,

to see a mound , a rotting sty.

Weeds, flies, tyres and bricks

needles and used coverings for pricks.

S3600004

Tonnes and tonnes of industrial spoil

window frames and piles of soil

S3600014

The notices were strange to see

amongst the stinking debris

 

“In this place I cannot exist

I’ve been conned, swindled- pissed!”

 

S3600011

Tired and worn he’d lost the plot

he took his scarf and tied a knot

 

 

S3600015

A womble’s tale ends right there

But are you bothered , do you care?

 

Others live within this hell

they live in shit, it’s called  “Sandwell.”

11701177_388652531342017_2411176967596380258_n

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Underground overground Womble in Oldb’ry

Pictures from the past

“New” Dudley Port canal breach 1899 picture comes to light!

scan0009

There are several pictures of one of Tipton’s most infamous canal legends- the breach of the canal at the site of the Rattlechain Brickworks on September 9th 1899. I believe that this one has not been previously published in any local history book. Please note I am not giving a free pass to anyone to do so, which is why I have chosen to put the website logo over the top. It offers a view from the other side of the breach, actually in what appears to be the pit itself, perhaps from a boat?

On seeing this for the first time after coming into my possession, I at first questioned the authenticity, given both its stark clarity and crisp egg albumen character. But I believe it to be genuine and not a reproduction- it is a real photograph from the time. The figures standing on the emptied canal on either side, appear to match the onlookers seen in other postcards. The upturned boat mentioned to have disappeared into the pit is visible in the centre of the shot, as are the old telegraph poles along the section of the railway line. One can also see smouldering from the embankment which is curious, but can now be explained by further information that has come to light.

Evidential information concerning the depths of the marl pit as it then stood at the time of the breach support the claim that the pit was “100 yards deep”, and not as Rhodia tried to claim when constructing their cover up work reports a few years ago “100 foot deep”. This narrative I believe is one which attempts to deny what happened during the war years and what was buried there at this point. There is a major difference in the two depths, and they cannot both be right.

 

The Godfrey 1902 map contains the following information.

scan0016

Another source that I have recently discovered comes from the book Staffordshire by Vivien Bird, and there is a fairly detailed account of the canal burst there.

“Tipton has been described as the ‘Venice Of the Black Country’, and there are still a few oldsters to whom the ‘ninth of the ninth, ninety-nine’ has a significance almost equal to the ‘eleventh hour of the eleventh day of the eleventh month’ in 1918. On 9 September 1899 Barnett’s breach occurred early on a Saturday morning when 100 yards of canal towpath caved in and the canal began emptying itself through a chasm into the pit. Two iron-boats, full of ashes, were swept through the gap and hurtled down with the torrent. They belonged to Samuel Barnett, whose Rattlechain and Stour Valley brickworks obtained their clay from the marlpit, in which the water rose rapidly as it poured from the canal. Another boat began to race for the breach and only by jumping ashore and cutting the towrope was the boatman able to save himself and the horse. Another , near Dudley Port Station, accelerated its pace to overtake its horse, which followed willy-nilly at an increasing canter, and again the boatman scrambled ashore to arrest the boat’s headlong career by securing rope round a telegraph pole.

The marlhole, 100 yards deep and having a surface boundary of three acres, was quickly filled to the brim. Soon two miles of canal were drained, while six more miles lay muddy and lowered in depth. Locks were eventually closed above and below the breach. In Netherton Tunnel the level was lowered considerably and traffic on 40 miles of canal had to be diverted through the older Dudley Tunnel. Telegraphic communications between Dudley and Birmingham was impeded through the poles being swept away. Damage to canal property was estimated up to £50,000 while the catastrophe cost Mr Barnett about £3,000.”  

This account is possibly informed from a publication of the time called “The Engineer” . A remarkable report of the event is given on page  294 of the September 22nd 1899 edition which also describes how ashes were piled onto the canalside embankment, thus making it highly unstable. This explains the smoke effects in the postcards and the pictures. Together with heavy rain this would undoubtedly have caused a serious failure of the slope. This gives real depth to the events of that day and is easily the most graphic account which I have yet come across. The aftermath of the breach and operation which took place following it are also an important primary source of information. That the article in a respected magazine of the day states that the pit is “100 yards deep” I think should lay to rest the nonsense concerning the shallower depths which only appear to have surfaced during the Albright and Wilson late 20th Century ownership.

 

“FAILURE OF CANAL BANK.

One of those mishaps to which even the best engineering structures are occasionally liable occurred at four o’clock in the morning on the 9th inst. at Dudley Port, where a canal embankment gave way, occasioning considerable damage, but happily no loss of life. The accident happened on the main waterway, known as the Stour Valley low level, belonging to the Birmingham Canal Company, at a point about midway between Dudley Port and Albion railway stations. The main line of the London and North-Western Railway to Birmingham runs almost parallel with this section of the canal for a considerable distance on the opposite side to that on which the embankment collapsed, and in the immediate vicinity there are several extensive arms of the canal constructed for the use of manufacturers. Close to the scene of the occurrence is Mr. Barnett’s Rattle Chain and Stour Valley Brickworks, which obtain a large proportion of their supply of clay from a marl pit directly opposite to where the canal embankment gave way. Only the towing path intervened between the side of the canal and the edge of the clay pit, and it was at this point that the failure started.

 The gap rapidly increased in size till it was some 100 yards long, and about 80 yards wide, and through it was practically emptied the contents of some six miles length of the canal, including the arms affected. The marl-hole, although, 100 yards deep, and having a surface boundary of about  three acres, was quickly filled to the brim, whilst nearly two  acres of surrounding meadows were also submerged. The torrent swept everything before it, carrying with it thousands of tons of material, washing away the bed of the canal in the vicinity of the breach to a depth of many yards, damaging the towpath on both sides of the canal for a considerable distance on each side of the gap. All along the drained portion of the canal lay boats stranded, some being completely overturned. One boat, fortunately having no occupants, was bent double.

 Some damage was sustained by a section of the permanent way of the adjoining railway, one line being rendered useless for a time  owing to the water washing under the metals and destroying the ballast, whilst both lines were for a short time rendered useless, the traffic during this temporary stoppage being conducted over the Grand Junction line. Under the direction of Mr. Entwistle, district superintendent, the work of repairing the damage was speedily commenced, and before long, one of the lines was in a condition to allow the passage of trains without much danger. Telegraph Wires and posts near the scene of the disaster were thrown down owing to the fissures made in the towpath and the rush of water, and throughout the day telegraphic communication between Dudley and Birmingham was considerably impeded.  The officials and men of the canal company got to work as soon as possible, and made strenuous efforts to mitigate the misfortune.

On the arrival of one of the inspectors and a gang of men, steps were at once taken to prevent the canals being drained from further levels. The locks at Ryder’s Green, a mile towards Birmingham, were closed, and so were those above the breach near Dudley Port station, and the flow of water in the main canal was stopped within about two hours and a-half after the outbreak was first observed. Planks were also put across the openings of the arms of the canal, a large quantity of water being impounded in this way. In addition to two miles of the main canal being completely drained, the water in the Netherton tunnel and other branches of the canal was considerably lowered. The canal is about 24ft. wide and 6ft. deep, and· the length of the “low level,” as it is termed, is between thirty and forty miles. A rough estimate places the cost of repairing the whole of the damage at between £40,000 and £50,000; but this is not to be taken as official. It is expected that in a few weeks’ time the gap will be filled up so as to allow of the reconstruction of the canal and of the rebuilding of a firm embankment. With regard to the cause of the mishap, there are various versions extant, and one is that the embankment had been weakened by the blasting operations in the marlpit, which were going on till about a month or so ago, and that ashes have also been tipped on the banks, and these smouldering day by day, helped to loosen the tenacity of the puddle dam of clay which, with a thickness of 3ft., runs along the whole length of the level. Some heavy rainstorms had also occurred not long before the accident, and it is thought that this may perhaps have helped to contribute towards the giving way of the embankment.

On the day after the disaster about fifty men, under the direction of Mr. Nias, assistant engineer, were engaged constructing grooves for stop-planks to enable the working of the locks, above and below the destroyed embankment. By the afternoon a stank was completed at the Dunkirk Stop, about a quarter of a mile on the Birmingham side of the breach, so as to enable the working of the Brades Hall locks and open up traffic on to the Wolverhampton level. The men were afterwards chiefly occupied in putting in a set of stop-planks in the direction of Dudley Port Station, underneath a bridge, about a quarter of a mile on the other side of the chasm, to enable the filling of the Tipton section of the main canal. A stoppage was also constructed at the mouth of the section of the canal leading to Netherton tunnel, and water was let in up to almost the normal depth, allowing of the passage of the company’s boats conveying the material and implements required for the operations the in progress.

The traffic in the Netherton Tunnel section has been resumed, and boats are thus able to get to Wolverhampton and Birmingham via Tipton. The filling of the canal of the main level at the points indicated will allow of the passage of boats to all the works affected by the disaster, with the exception of Mr Barnett’s brickworks.

The Irish mail from Birmingham passed by the scene of the accident just after the water burst through the embankment, and at Dudley Port the engine-driver informed the station officials of what he had observed. A disaster of a very similar character occurred at Deepfields resulting in damage to property amounting to several thousands of pounds, the suspension of work at important iron and steel manufacturing industries employing about 2000 hands, and the stoppage of a large amount of traffic. The havoc wrought on that occasion was brought about by the collapse of a portion of embankment of the canal from Birmingham to Wolverhapmton, and, as in the case of the Dudley Port disaster, the water rushed through the gap into a huge clay-hole owned by Sir Alfred Hickman, creating a chasm twenty yards wide. Satisfaction is being expressed in the district at the energetic manner in which the engineering staff of the Canal Company is coping with the difficulty.

Several views of the gap and canal are given on page 295. Fig. 1 is looking towards Albion, and was  taken from the towing path. The London and North Western railway is seen on one side, and the brickfields and burning bank on the other. Fig. 2 is also taken from the towing path, but looking towards Dudley Port. Fig. 3 shows the railway embankment, and the broken siding. Fig. 4. is taken from the centre of the gap at the bottom looking towards Dudley Port. Our engravings are from  photographs by Mr. T. Lewis, Stratford-road, Birmingham.”

The pictures included in the report are shown below. I have scanned an original version of the magazine and also each picture in turn to show as much detail as possible.

Scan_20150908

S3700003

 

 

S3700004

 

S3700005

 

S3700006

Some constants of time remain which allows one to stand in the shadow of this event over a century later. The mainline Birmingham canal, railway line and Toll end works bridge looking towards Dudley Port have not grown legs, even though the use of the brickwork pit has obviously been of changing nature.

S3680001

View looking towards “Albion” from Birmingham canal at dawn. The brickworks have gone in the distance and greenery has replaced the ash. Pylons take the place of telegraph lines.

 

S3680002

View looking towards Dudley Port. The Toll End works bridge remains as does the railway line. The breach has been repaired from the towpath.

 

The Engineer article strengthens my opinion that Samuel Barnett was a rogue and conman who made great fortune out of an industry which was profitable at the time but gave little respect for the environment it scarred. He was after all a civic businessman who was  a member of Tipton Urban District Council 1895-1901. There are many websites and local history groups who are what I would term ‘industrial history cocksuckers.’ I’m not apologising for the crudity of expression because eulogising industrialists who could  influence events to their favour by buying it is not in my vocabulary. Making saints out of such people and naming streets after them appears to be another 20th Century phenomenon usually if there is a book to sell or a hidden agenda to promote.

Barnett met his fate at the age of 64 after reportedly falling from a bolting horse on the cart that he was riding in Tividale near The boat pub. His one arm handicap may well explain and have played a part in the accident, but the irony of the demise in context with the imagery of the boat and horse being swallowed up by his breached pit in the accounts above cannot be ignored. Maybe somewhere in Tividale a crater to hell had been dug out by his brickmaking empire and delivered a poetic repose.

S3700001

A street in Tipton which belies a dark name from history

He left behind him close to £60,000 to William and Thomas Barnett, presumably his sons and solicitor Frank Dawes.

dead barnett

The aftermath of the crater he dug out becoming a repository for chemical and military waste only compounds the manner in which others that followed him have also usurped this area for personal gain. It is almost like Tolkien’s ring of power but one forged of clay. How fitting that the devil’s element found a home and grave there amongst the ashes of industrialism.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Pictures from the past

Tom’s bomb

S3600023

 

There was a boy whose name was Tom,
Who made a high explosive bomb,
By mixing up some iodine
With sugar, flour and plasticine
Then, just to make it smell more queer
He added Daddy’s home-made beer.
He took it off to school one day
And when they all went out to play,
He left it by the radiator
As the heat was getting greater
The mixture in the bomb grew thick
And very soon it seemed to tick
Miss Knight came in and gazed with awe
To see the bomb upon the floor
“Dear me”, she said “it is a bomb,
An object worth escaping from”
She went to Mr Holliday
And said in tones that were not gay,
“Headmaster, this is not much fun
There is a bomb in classroom one!”
“Great snakes” said he, and gave a cough
And said, “I hope it won’t go off!
But on the off chance that it does
I think we’d better call the Fuzz”
A policeman came and said, “Oh, God,
We need the bomb disposal squad
Some firemen and a doctor too,
A helicopter and its crew
And, since I’m shaking in the legs
A cup of tea and hard boiled eggs!”
A bomb disposal engineer
Said, with every sign of fear,
“I’ve not seen one like that before,”
And rushed out, screaming, through the door.
Everyone became more worried
Till Tom, who seemed to be unflurried
Asked what was all the fuss about?
“I’ll pick it up and take it out.”
He tipped the contents down the drain
And peace and quiet reigned again
Tom just smiled and shook his head
And quietly to himself he said:
“Excitement’s what these people seek,
I’ll bring another one next week!”

David Hornsby

scan0037

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Tom’s bomb