{"id":14036,"date":"2022-01-25T04:59:33","date_gmt":"2022-01-25T04:59:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/whatliesbeneathrattlechainlagoon.org.uk\/?p=14036"},"modified":"2022-01-13T19:08:02","modified_gmt":"2022-01-13T19:08:02","slug":"white-phosphorus-match-ban-the-berne-convention-falsity","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/whatliesbeneathrattlechainlagoon.org.uk\/?p=14036","title":{"rendered":"White phosphorus match ban- The Berne Convention falsity"},"content":{"rendered":"

As evidenced in the last post<\/a>, matches containing white phosphorus were deadly for consumers, but even more so for the poor unfortunates who made them, particularly for scumbag Quaker companies like Bryant and May.<\/p>\n

The toxicity of these matches had been known by their makers, politicians and everyone else to be deadly poisonous for decades, yet still their manufacture with The Devil’s element\u00a0 continued into the new Century.<\/p>\n

In 1906, the political class, does what it always has done in making some pompous declaration, as it does today about “climate change” issues, and came up with the title “The<\/strong>\u00a0International Convention respecting the Prohibition of the Use of White (Yellow) Phosphorus in the Manufacture of Matches.”<\/b><\/p>\n

The treaty forbade the use of P4 in matches, and also banned the sale and import of said matches, yet it did not come into force for several years, and Britain was not an immediate signatory either.<\/p>\n

The scale of import of matches into Britain is shown in the article below from the time, which suggests that instead of poisoning British workers as they had been for decades, the scum match makers were now using cheap foreign expendable labour instead. Around 4 million estimated boxes of white phosphorus matches were thought to be being imported in 1907.\u00a0<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

9th December 1908 Newspaper: Daily Telegraph & Courier (London)<\/p><\/div>\n

I came across a copy of the treaty, and set it out below; it is written in both French and English, given the place where it was negotiated.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

The treaty as signed on 26\/9\/06 was only brought forward by Britain two years later on 28\/12\/08.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

The small print of this is that Britain only banned the use in the United Kingdom, and not its “empire”, sorry (countries invaded in the name of royalty). I would therefore wager that companies making these matches sprung up in India and other such countries, where labour rights would have been non existent.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

There is a long list of pompousness about those involved as heads of state, and one can see from this that these wankers would be very prevalent in just 8 years after the signing of the 8 article point treaty for engaging in the deadliest war the world had ever seen – INCLUDING THE USE OF WHITE PHOSPHORUS IN WEAPONS OF WAR TO KILL PEOPLE.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Albright and Wilson of course would benefit by producing said chemical for this purpose for Britain in the run up to and during The Second World War, as well as for France.\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

The procrastination of Britain’s new law would then be kicked out in hoarded stocks for even longer after the date of “ban”, as evidenced by the article below from the time.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

4th January 1909 Newspaper: London Daily News<\/p><\/div>\n

The shallowness of such conventions continues to this day, in the use of this chemical weapon<\/a>s being classified as “smoke screening” by Governments and militaries across the globe.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

As evidenced in the last post, matches containing white phosphorus were deadly for consumers, but even more so for the poor unfortunates who made them, particularly for scumbag Quaker companies like Bryant and May. The toxicity of these matches had … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/whatliesbeneathrattlechainlagoon.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14036"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/whatliesbeneathrattlechainlagoon.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/whatliesbeneathrattlechainlagoon.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/whatliesbeneathrattlechainlagoon.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/whatliesbeneathrattlechainlagoon.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=14036"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/whatliesbeneathrattlechainlagoon.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14036\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14310,"href":"https:\/\/whatliesbeneathrattlechainlagoon.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14036\/revisions\/14310"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/whatliesbeneathrattlechainlagoon.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=14036"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/whatliesbeneathrattlechainlagoon.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=14036"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/whatliesbeneathrattlechainlagoon.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=14036"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}