{"id":1856,"date":"2013-05-06T20:58:06","date_gmt":"2013-05-06T20:58:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/whatliesbeneathrattlechainlagoon.org.uk\/?page_id=1856"},"modified":"2022-07-17T18:00:30","modified_gmt":"2022-07-17T18:00:30","slug":"hs032","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/whatliesbeneathrattlechainlagoon.org.uk\/?page_id=1856","title":{"rendered":"HS\/032"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"toxic<\/a><\/p>\n

HS\/032<\/strong><\/p>\n

OVERVIEW<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

This application<\/a> was decided on 25\/2\/2005 and introduced four more subtances to be classified as Hazardous substances. The table below gives the names and quantities involved for these “very toxic chemicals”.<\/b><\/p>\n

NB THE BREAKDOWN PRODUCTS OF THESE CHEMICALS ARE ALSO THEMSELVES “VERY TOXIC CHEMICALS”, BUT THIS DOESN’T EVER APPEAR TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE HSE. WE HAVE ALSO LISTED THESE HERE. <\/strong><\/p>\n

\"scan0004\"<\/a><\/p>\n

The HSE had no objections but suggested a condition be in place to store the substances in the poly phosphoric acid building only. Rhodia had wanted to store them anywhere on the site,\u00a0and Tom Dutton queries the decision notice in a letter to the council dated\u00a0\u00a0MARCH 16TH 2005. There is no reply by the HSE.<\/p>\n

http___planapps.sandwell.gov.uk_WAM_doc_Correspondence-173518.pdf_extension=<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

HS032 TOM DUTTONS<\/a><\/p>\n

The planning committee report can be read below<\/p>\n

http___planapps.sandwell.gov.uk_WAM_doc_Committee Report-173509.pdf_extension=<\/a>E.<\/a><\/p>\n

Once again the buried advertisement suggested ringing the works manager Steve Hampson, (of the “Safe Haven” fame concerning rattlechain lagoon) for a cosy chat if anyone wanted to see a copy of the proposals.<\/p>\n

\"HS32\"<\/a><\/p>\n

There was an interesting objection to the proposal citing hindering development of housing in the Mill Lane area- within the HSE consultation zone, and an article from the Sandwell chronicle ironically quoting a local councillor with strong links to the company\u00a0 bemoaning lack of development in the area likely to attract fly tipping!<\/p>\n

http___planapps.sandwell.gov.uk_WAM_doc_Correspondence-173519.pdf_extension=<\/a><\/p>\n

\"hs32cons\"<\/a>

“POTENTIAL FOR FIRST CLASS HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ON THE SITE” LOL<\/p><\/div>\n

Safety data sheets for these chemicals were supplied by Rhodia. These chemicals are known as BIOCIDES<\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n

IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT RHODIA CLAIM TO NOT TEST SUBSTANCES ON ANIMALS, YET THIS, THEIR OWN CHEMICAL OPENLY STATES “UNPUBLISHED REPORTS” OF SUCH, INCLUDING THE GHASTLY PRACTICE OF RUBBING BLINDING SUBSTANCES INTO RABBITS EYES. THEIR CLAIMS ARE THEREFORE LIES.<\/strong><\/p>\n

TOLCIDE C80\u00a0<\/span><\/strong>Also known as (benzothiazol-2-ylthio)methyl thiocyanate.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

http___planapps.sandwell.gov.uk_WAM_doc_Other-173511.pdf_extension=<\/a><\/p>\n

This chemical marketed by Rhodia as (TCMTB) is a non-metallic organosulphur compound in liquid form.\u00a0 It is used in various stages of leather production and preservation applications. The data sheet identifies that the chemical is<\/p>\n